Jack Wilshere not like a new signing at all

When I heard the learn’d astronomer,When the proofs, the figures, were ranged in columns before me,When I was shown the charts and diagrams, to add, divide, and measure them,When I sitting heard the astronomer where he lectured with much applause in the lecture-room,How soon unaccountable I became tired and sick,Till rising and gliding out I wander’d off by myself,In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time,Look’d up in perfect silence at the stars.
We pick our way through carefully crafted arguments about substitutions. We model Arsenal’s accounts and check sums. We stare at squad sheets late into the night looking for blame. And we turn to graphs and charts of performances to reveal ultimate truths. But in the end, it’s just a foot that derails an entire season.
Or does it?
As we’ve seen nearly every year as far back as I can remember an Arsenal player always has some kind of injury to start the season. Then the boss talks about how his recovery is going well. Then he starts light running or training. And just when the butterflies are settled in my stomach and the transfer window is closing, the boss announces a setback.
This time it’s Jack Wilshere who has had a setback and could be out for the remainder of the season. I won’t bore you with the details of his injury or what the setback is because, frankly, I don’t care. Maybe you need to know if it’s an inflamed bone or a tendon in his calf that rubs against another tendon and causes him discomfort. Maybe you’d like to know the course of treatment. Maybe it will be horse placenta, which seemed to work wonders for van Persie.
I’m also not someone who is going to blame the medical staff at Arsenal because from what I can tell this team doesn’t just suffer from some fluid in the muscle, this team has had an unusual number of broken bones. Cesc, Nasri, Clichy, Frimpong, Robin, Gibbs, Diaby, Eduardo, and Ramsey all had their bones broken before this season and have spent/will spend time in the recovery table for those injuries. And this year alone we’ve had Wilshere, Jenkinson, and Sagna all out with broken bones.
If you want to complain about the fact that “they” rested Wilshere’s “inflamed bone” at the start of the season instead of going straight into surgery then you’re missing a major plot point in that story. “They” includes Jack Wilshere who, in consultation with his doctor, chose to rest his leg rather than go under the knife. Jack Wilshere is under contract at Arsenal, but last time I checked, he is still allowed to make medical decisions for himself without first consulting us.
Or perhaps you want to blame Capello, Psycho, or Arsene for playing him too much? Sure, go right ahead. They did play him too much and do deserve some of the blame. Along with Jack, who took way too long to take a stand against playing in the U-21 team.
Maybe it’s squad size? Wenger perhaps shouldn’t be carrying dead weight in the squad and should be buying players who can compete and in a perfect world I would totally agree. But then again last season was a year in which I recall lauding the depth in midfield at the start of the season as the Arsenal midfield was Nasri, Cesc, Song, Wilshere, Rosicky, and Denilson. Again, it was injuries to players like Cesc that forced Wilshere to play so much.
Sure, burnout of Ramsey is a very real threat but Arsene has tried Benayoun and Rosicky there and Rosicky actually had a great game for Arsenal against Man U. Probably the best performer in midfield. So, rotation there is an option.
I don’t know. I do know that Wilshere was seen by many as the existential-crisis- slayer at Arsenal. The player who was going to come back fit and right all the wrongs. And there is no doubting his talent, spirit or love for the club. He would be a huge addition to the squad and will be sorely missed, no doubt.
But the position that Wilshere plays in is actually doing OK as far as numbers. If there’s a crisis requiring a rash purchase, it’s fullbacks that Arsenal need at the moment. Djourou is a decent player but his passing numbers are unsurprisingly much lower than Sagna. Also, Djourou’s pace is suspect and you saw that against Man U and will see it again against any team that has a speedy left wing player (read, “all of them”). And as on cue, the team news this morning is the surprise announcement that Bacary Sagna is back in contention for Sunday’s match.
Ahhh the mysteries of the universe. I think I need some night air.
Comments
I am simply fearing now that Sagna doesn’t have an aneurysm of some sort.Hopefully Yennaris will be allowed to start but he would need protection from either our right winger or midfielder. The issue is if we play the OX on the right, we have 2 inexperienced players on that one side. Of course playing Walcott alongside Yennaris is hardly a great thing either but he has more experience than the OX playing there.
Well-stated, all. Minor quibble – didn’t Frimpong actually “do his cruciate,” not break a bone?
burnout a threat to ramsey? mate hes been piss poor for a while now.as much as i like him i think a lot of fans wont criticise him because of the injury.thats fair enough but at least admit the fact hes been shit the last few months
I wonder if there’s going to be a FIFA cover curse similar to the old Madden game cover curse that seemed to be in play with all the players they would put on the cover of the Madden Sega or Xbox games. Wilshere was the coverboy this year. Either that or I just curse every player whose name I have on the back of my kit (Bendtner, Clichy – followed w/ an injury, Vermaelen, now Wilshere).
I’m not so sure we don’t need another body in there to cover midfield. With full-backs returning I think the Coq will get more games in there, hopefully to keep Arteta reasonably well rested but Benayoun has shown he doesn’t have the physicality to play there which leaves Song/Coq/Arteta/Ramsey/Rosicky to cover 3 positions for the rest of the season, I think we need someone else. Nice as it would be for Diaby to miraculously recover I’d want someone else, recall Lansbury imo if Wenger wants to keep developing rather than flashing a little cash.
Of course, being able to get our game flowing a little better with actually having FBs is welcome and will ease the pressure on the midfield but it’s an important area and without our strikers pulling their weight more is needed from that area.
Did Wenger say it would be mad to lose a crack at the title for not having a left back in December, we have lost the last 3 matches, seems he knows but just didn’t act.
I agree that Wilshere was never going to be our savior, though we do miss some creativity in the middle. Yes, a much larger problem has been the loss of full-back support in our attack, but I’ve often felt we lack something behind the striker. Ramsey just isn’t Cesc, and we should never expect him to be, but he is being asked to be our play-maker, more so than Arteta.
Rosicky, indeed, was outstanding against United. I thought Benayoun would be good for that role, but I’m not so sure anymore (he was utterly insipid against Fulham, was it? the losses are just sort of piling up in my mind into one giant pile of shit). Anyway, I think Rosicky deserves to start ahead of Ramsey, at least for a game or two to see how he does. I feel he has a better eye for a forward pass, and he moves the ball much quicker than Ramsey.
I never expected Wilshire to play much this season, if at all. However, next season a midfield of Song, Wilshere and Arteta is very tantalising. So much so, I am wondering which one will be the long term injury next season.
Overall, I think a signing is much more necessary for the front three but do not expect any in this window and we will just have to solder on.
From the sounds of the things the full back issue will be somewhat solved in the next couple of weeks, and Yannaris for me provides reasonable cover in the interim on the right.
@ickenhamgooner,
“So much so, I am wondering which one will be the long term injury next season.”
===
Haha! So true. [weeping]
Does anyone know (probably this refers mostly to Tim) what are the wages of Almunia, Squillaci, Gibbs, Diaby, Denilson and Bendtner?
I did some Tarzan math and just assumed they are about 50.000 pounds per week each, so that would mean they cost Arsenal around 15 millions per year. 15 million pounds for players that are watching every Arsenal game on the TV just like me, is a rather hefty amount.
Guessing that’s not right as I’m sure Sunderland and the Brazilian team that Denilson’s on are picking up some if not all of their weekly wages.
@ArseChicago, I thought Arsenal were paying their salaries, but I guess you could be right. Anyway, since lately -1′s are being stabbed for just being realistic, I just wanted to say that maybe when we see these guys go (and hopefully that will be soon), we will probably see some quality reinforcements as well.
Only not in January.
As Jamie from Young Guns commented today, it might be wise for Arsenal to give players away, while staking some claim on sell-on fees (as Arsenal did with Barazite today). At this point, we need to get the wages of at least 10-11players off our hands (Almunia, Diaby, Park, Chamakh, Squillaci, Eastmond, Mannone, Bendtner, Denilson, Watt (who just went on loan to division 2), Vela, etc.)
@ArseChicago, Vela. I forgot about Vela and the fact that he is still an Arsenal player, which practically says everything about the Mexican.
@Teampossible,
They are all on around £2.6-3.5m a year. It’s safe to average them at £3m.
We don’t know the deals that Arsenal made with each of the loan teams that players went to. So, Arsenal could be paying all or some of all those player’s salaries.
Your point is well taken but let me add something you might not have thought about: those salaries are high, but to bring in better players you will probably have to pay more.
@Tim, Interesting point, Tim, but at this moment you don’t need to replace every single one of them. Given their contribution to this team, you could probably just bring one high quality player and give him the salary he deserves, since he will probably end up playing more than all of them combined.
@Teampossible, until he gets injured =P
Wasn’t it a few weeks ago, or more recently, that everyone was amazed at Jack’s rapid recouperation? Today, not here, there is some LOL reaction from some parts, as if someone brought a cuise liner too close to shore or something.
Jack was never going to have much impact on this season — he still had to get game fitness and sharpness, and that would happen in games where it might or might not be prudent to play someone whose potential and past performance are great, but who is not fully up to par.
What I find most amazing is the automatic assumption that Jack is going to change the team offensively. Did I miss something last year? He played very well, with vigor and commitment and strength and desire and all those favored English qualities that conveniently can’t be reduced to statistics or shown to create goals, but he did not score or assist much, and while I think he can in the future, maybe its a bit much to assume he can do it from day one in the remaining months of the season.
By the way, Tim, I think you have to divide things finer that merely breaks and non-breaks. There are clean breaks and minor fractures, and then there are compound fractures. Very very different. Ramsey, Eduardo, Diaby are compound fractures — and we know what’s happened subsequently to them. (Isn’t it good that the career killers lacked “intent”, or imagine how bad it could have been!) Soft tissue injuries are, often, far worse and take far longer to heal — many ACL recoveries are delayed. How about persistent hamstring problems? In the hierarchy of injuries, I’d rank them from bad to worse as 1) clean breaks/fractures, 2) soft tissue injuries, 3) (the worst) compund fractures.
Being realistic Wilshere’s return wasn’t going to revive the team in and of itself, even if the foolish and optimistic part of me was hoping he could quickly establish some form and have a real impact on things.
But, being equally realistic, a fit Jack would in the least provide cover/an option at midfield so as to allow players, such as Ramsey and Arteta, who have been pushed to the limit a little bit of a breather. The other thing he gives us, if not goals or assists, is calmness in possession. He has that ability to keep the ball, squirm out of pressure, and the energy to harass the opponent in the middle of the park. All things we are sorely missing at the moment.
I think Bunburyist is correct in that the lack of width from our fullbacks’ absence is hurting us more than our midfield play, but the latter is suffering increasingly with each game because of the former. In particular, Ramsey seems to be trying to do too much on his own because there are simply no wide outlets. A lot, then would seem to depend on our fullbacks recovering. I’m not exactly holding my breath there.
I think we all have placed a little too much faith in Jack, I for one know that I was bragging to my scouse,manc mates that we had England’s future finest ready to to ram it back to them. Shows that perhaps restraint is called for regardless of how exciting a prospect is. Let’s all step back and give him time.
Agree with both 11canons and Bunburyist. While our midfield will continue to challenged to keep its shape and fight for possession for those through balls, we will at least have Sagna returning to to help anchor us for the run (if he finds his form quickly enough). Mr. Reliable, one of the best right backs in the world, can only help us…
It does not matter, as we are battling in mid-table and have no hope of regaining 4th. Let the players rest and give kids a chance. The only problem maybe RvP’s contract at the end of the season…
Let us get through the game against Aston Villa first…
can we secure another 1-0 win?
@DF, we are not mid table. we are in the top 1/4, 5th of 20th, despite being the most predictable, frail, weak Arsenal team in my living memory. we still have 5 days for new acquisitions, and late is always how we roll anyway. there is talent on the market for 20-25 million, and if we are panicking, I am sure our forthright and prescient speculations trading Denver Nuggets owner is panicking also. we best sit tight. our best defender will be back soon, and our capable, young left back, will also return promptly. in midfield we will be cushioned by the stabilizing return of our new spainiard, and also by the doubtless sublime albeit short return of Diaby, who can relieve pressure on Ramsey. Thierry Henry will return, Andrey Arshavin is playing to impress potential suitors (better), and Chamakh will be back also, and this is not entirely useless. I still think we will sign at least a semi decent striker. we face a tired, languid Milan side who will not be enhanced by Carlos Tevez after all, a real fear of mine of late. we are recuperating at a point at which we traditionally have floundered, so cheer up. not as bad as some would have us feel (but would be made much better if we stop with our moral outrage of the fact that clubs want to be paid properly for letting us sign their best assets…)
Well, at least it seams Chamakh will be heading back to London soon. His seat on the bench barely got cold.
i think i really wanted wilshire to be “signed” asap as ramsey is so shit (at times not always) and we do not have a lot of great midfield options…
wilshere*