Tag Archives: Jack Wilshere

There's only one Aaron Ramsey

Jack, Aaron, team balance, new keepers, and Arshavin

There is way too much news this morning to get into, so we might as well get stuck in.

First, the response from the readers to yesterday’s blog about who should start in the Arsenal midfield once Wilshere is back was fantastic and I have to admit that there were several opinions in the comments that I hadn’t thought about.

The one that struck a chord was the idea of the defensive balance between Arteta and Ramsey versus Arteta and Wilshere. It’s a bit early to tell (and way too little data to predict) but I have to agree with the gut feeling that Ramsey just provides the team with a true double pivot. Wilshere is more inclined to get forward and Ramsey, despite his 8 months of playing in the “Cesc role”, seems more tactically disciplined.

As one reader pointed out, this is borne out by the numbers somewhat with Ramsey claiming an amazing 94% tackle rate (according to Squawka.com) with 45/48 tackles. Meanwhile Wilshere is a mere 24/28 tackles. I say “mere” and I mean it, Wilshere is tackling at a decent rate (86%) but Wilshere has played more minutes than Aaron (1503 v. 1478) and when you look at the minutes per tackle, Jack is averaging a tackle every 63 minutes whereas Aaron is one every 32 minutes. Similarly going forward, Ramsey is only 27/57 dribbles whereas Wilshere is 52/91. Obviously, that’s not the be-all-end-all of the comparison but it indicates a difference in balance between the two.

And really that’s what a lot of people have been saying for a few months now. It’s not a knock (necessarily) on either player. It’s just what’s happening with those two at the moment: Jack is playing more forward and Aaron is playing deeper.

So, which of those two you pick is really up to how you see the team playing on any given day and… whether you think Rosicky needs a rest. That’s where I see Jack getting his chances the rest of this season. Rosicky and Jack have a very similar attitude: when they receive the ball, they both turn at the defense and attack. And handing the central role to either of them doesn’t seem to be hurting the play of Cazorla. Santi wasn’t the best against West Brom but when he started on the left against Reading he scored and assisted. In fact, Santi has started on the left 7 times this season (in League and CL play) and has 4 goals and 3 assists; compared to 29 times in the middle with 8 goals and 5 assists. So, on average, it’s not that bad for him to start on the left.

Obviously, Arsenal aren’t playing against “Average” for the rest of the season so it’ll have to be a game by game call as to who plays where and when. That’s why Arsene Wenger gets the big bucks.

In other news the Daily Mail is stating that Arsenal have tabled a bid for Stoke keeper Asmir Begovich. Now, I’m not sure how much I believe anything the Daily Mail publishes. Oh wait, that’s a lie, I am sure: it’s “not much”. But there have been signs that Wenger is unhappy with the keeper situation at Arsenal for a few years now and there have been signs that I have been unhappy with the keeper situation for a few years as well.

Arsene tried to buy Schwarzer and Reina, that is fact. You may think each was just a rumor but they were actual targets and Arsenal pursued both heavily. What stopped the deals were various and sundry details which we are not actually aware of (Mark Hughes played a major part in stopping the Schwarzer deal) but the fact remains that Wenger has, within his means, attempted to buy an experienced keeper in each of the last few years. So it wouldn’t be a total surprise if Arsene was asking early about a keeper like Begovich.

I’ve already received numerous requests for comments about whether I rate Begovich over Szczesny and I will only say this: I see them as equals and that’s not a bad thing. Begovich has an astounding high claim rate of 100%, but Szczesny is no slouch with 97%. Begovich, however, is forced into high claims a lot more than Szcz and despite the huge numbers of high claims, punches in only about 13% of his games compared to Szczesny who punches in 42% of his games. In that sense, Bego is much more reliable.

Szczesny is a better distributor, but then that would probably change once Begovich is no longer being asked to lump it out to Peter Crouch. They both have similar numbers of errors that lead to shots… I could go on and on but just know that for me the two compare very similarly except on the issue of high claims.

Where there is no comparison is Begovich to Fabianski. Fabianski claims a horrible 56% and punches 33%. Even Mannone had a better high claims rate than Fabianski, with just the two mental errors being among the main reasons why he didn’t take over when Wenger benched Szczesny.

So, in that case, buying a player like Begovich is actually a very sound idea. He will certainly challenge Szczesny for the starting spot and there is nothing wrong with that. Begovich is also very clearly better than any of the current backup solutions at Arsenal and again, there is nothing wrong with that. If Szczesny loses his starting spot to Begovich, then maybe he wasn’t good enough to be Arsenal’s long term keeper anyway?

Arshavin prepares for the North London derby

And speaking of “not good enough” there are a spate of news report this morning that Arshavin is considering retirement (or not) at the end of this season. Funny, I thought he retired two years ago after his goal against Barcelona made him one of the greatest players on Earth!

Arseblog said almost everything I have to say about Arshavin: clearly a talented player but just as clearly a player who lacked that something, that extra application which divides the greats from the Arshavins. This is the point where some of you will have a go at the manager but I can say that every time I saw Arshavin try a little flick-on-back-heel-passallasso in Arsenal’s midfield I saw a player who was being lazy, relying on his talent alone and not both talent and hard work. I know that those passes are exciting in FIFA 13 and on YouTube but in a real football match they have no place. And that’s why Arshavin had no place.

I will try to do a By the Numbers post on Arshavin over at Arseblog News sometime in the next few days, there were certainly some strange numbers in his career at Arsenal. And perhaps Les can do a Rogues Gallery post on Arshavin? We’ll see!

Until then.

Qq

PS: Gods damn it! I forgot to welcome our newest contributor, Cliffy. he is going to be adding a weekly cartoon, like the one below, which will be included in a post and on the sidebar of the main page. Please welcome him!

Arsenal's Mozart

Man at the Match,Chary: Santi’s double flushes (Birmingham) Villa down to drop zone

A goal in each half from Cazorla gave the Arsenal the just sort of scrappy win that a team lacking in fluency needs to regain confidence. Without looking convincing the team, carried by Santi & Jack to an extent, snatched the 3 points needed to keep the top four finish in sight despite a Villa equaliser that led to a nervy final twenty five minutes.

After a two successive home defeats Arsenal returned to the League on a bitterly cold day to line up against Paul Lambert’s Villa to stop the rot and prevent 3 losses in a row, which last happened over a decade ago. Team selection wise the only surprises were Diaby preferred to Ramsey and Giroud starting over Podolski; Sagna’s injury meant Jenks came in at right back with the BFG/Vermaelen centre back pairing and Monreal completing the back line. The announcement of the subs brought a smattering of boos when Gervinho’s name was read out; slightly disappointing behaviour that.

The away section was more or less full and the stadium overall was probably 80-85% full to my eyes with the Villa fans soon settling into their “Kumbaya my lord….oh lord, shit support” chant as soon as the Gooners initial cheers for their team subsided

villa fans

Arsenal started brightly – if not as quickly as we’d like, still in a more positive fashion than lately with Jack and Santi the form players catching the eye.

Jack was driving forward with all his dribbles and surging runs and for once an early Arsenal goal was scored by him feeding Santi, who slotted home after his initial shot seemed to rebound back to him. A welcome early goal prevented the shivering Gooners from the anxiety of seeing the away side grow in confidence while the score remained nil nil.

santi 1

“One nil to the Arsenal” drowned out the Villa fans as well as their curious habit of applauding non-stop and for no apparent reason, a real puzzler.

Villa seemed to create little and a number of times passes up field went astray or long punts into touch, N’Zogbia contributed little and Agbonlahor, except for a theatrical dive, also seemed anonymous. Having said that a number of the Arsenal players were struggling with Diaby looking like he would lose possession every time he had the ball, his languid, casual (and slow) style not very convincing.

Diaby did thread through some useful passes but he and, unusually, Arteta shanked a few passes astray. After Diaby dwelt on the ball too long he seemed to be fouled, with the foul not being called and Diaby getting booked for tripping over his tackler in retribution.

Jenks was having a quiet game but in time I believe he has the potential to be a quality fullback, his attitude reminds me of Dixon when Ian Wright once spoke about a half time talk he was getting from George Graham: “Look at Dicko, he’s having a ‘mare but he still wants the ball”.

Jenks has the same attitude and I’d take that sort of guy over a more talented but lazier player every day of the week. Theo also had a relatively quiet game but he’d clearly been identified as a danger man and Villa were doubling up on him, the lad certainly tried though and did break his shackles enough times.

Aside from scoring the opener Santi was buzzing all over the pitch, chasing lost causes and generally snapping at the heels of the Villa defenders – on one occasion he was sure he’d won a goal kick but when a corner was awarded to Villa I saw him, a few yards in front of me, bawling at the lino – the man cares!

never a corner

Only Jack seemed to have the same snap all around the pitch and the same confidence that he would not lose possession.

Half time approached and Arsenal went into the break one nil up with not too many scares.

The touchline half time interview was with Paul Davis, an under rated (by those outside of Arsenal FC) player of the George Graham era, who had silky skills, and was delighted to be still working for the club he loved in some capacity.

As the second half kicked off the skies darkened and flecks of snow peppered the pitch as Arsenal continued to press forward for the second goal at the end opposite to me, the North Bank, with cross after cross from Theo failing to find an onrushing forward for a tap in and a two goal cushion.

Giroud was working hard and his aerial prowess in defence and attack is something I’m glad we have. In recent years we had no forward who could win flick ons from our goal kicks with any regularity and the fact Olivier works so well at defending corners and free kicks away is what has endeared him to the Gooner faithful. The tosh perpetuated by the English press about him having to win the fans round is just that – tosh.

Sadly a recurring feature of Arsenal’s play came back to allow Villa an equaliser – namely over committing ourselves at corners and being caught on the counter – a clearance from an Arsenal corner was met by a misdirected header from Jenks, which fell into the path of the wee man Weimann, who scurried between our centre backs to score. Looking at the replay on the big screen Chesney didn’t seem to have covered himself with glory as quite a few around me suggested he should have stopped the equaliser. The 2 or 3 good saves he made in the first half from rare Villas forward forays were forgotten and I sense much will be made of Chesney’s clanger.

Having heard about the fractious atmosphere at the Blackburn game I feared the home supporters would be getting jumpy, however while there was exasperation at the chances spurned, on the whole the crowd were there with a “Come on Arsenal!” to keep the sustained pressure up for the last 25 minutes of the game.

Ramsey replaced Diaby then Podolski for Jenks, a sign that Wenger wanted the 3 points so that Ramsey then slotted into right back as the surge for the winner started.

It has to be said that the referee today didn’t have a bad game and reasonable consistency was shown in what constituted a foul/push and what was a dive.

As time ticked on Lambert and his assistant were jumping up and down in, and sometimes outside, their technical area like cats on a hot tin roof. Mindful of the fact that an Arsenal winner seemed imminent. Monreal, who had a decent game (except for one occasion where his positioning allowed him to be bypassed and a Villa shot on goal resulted) latched onto a through ball, I think from Podolski (who had entered the fray with a shot almost on his first touch), with an overlapping run that ended in a cross which Santi, with a deft flick of his left foot, planted into the bottom right hand corner.

2nd goal

Joy unconfined!

The stadium let out a shout of relief and a sea of clenched fists raised to the heavens was to be seen. Reward for the attacking play in the last quarter of the game was there in the form of the winning goal. Even the clapping had stopped in the Villa section as their fans realised they were in the relegation zone now and no amount of Kumbayas would change that fact.

Injury seemed to last an age but there did not seem to be a sense of panic amongst the crowd about conceding a late goal, and the final whistle meant three scrappily fought for points were ours.

final whistle

Not the most convincing of performances but how many times have we seen the so called experts laud a ManUre performance where they won a game in a similarly scrappy manner? Three points are vital for the return of confidence for our team and while it was a less than convincing performance all points are needed at this stage of the season.
Onwards and upwards, UTA!

Charybdis1966 (on twitter and Youtube)

dirty luiz

Jack be nimble, Jack be quick, Jack makes good old England tick

The English National team beat Brazil 2-1 last night and the stars of the team were all made at Arsenal. Sure, Gerrard captained the team, Rooney scored the first, and Lampard scored the second but make no mistake that it was Jack Wilshere who bossed the midfield and Theo Walcott who cracked Brazil’s nut.

Wilshere was so good last night that even the normally dour Stuart Robson was effusive with praise during the broadcast, hailing Jack as a player beyond his years. Nearly every time he touched the ball, Jack looked to create. Time and again he received possession and turned into the jaws of the Brazilian defense, wriggling past midfielders, playing delightful 1-2 passes with Tom Cleverly to open space, and finding the runs of Danny Welbeck on his left or the electric Theo Walcott on his right.

It was exactly that type of run which opened the scoring. Jack took a pass from Rooney (who followed with one of his by now trademarked midfield runs) and with a burst of pace gave himself the inches past his midfield marker to play a perfect splitting pass to Theo Walcott. The Arsenal striker was just behind the ball enough that he couldn’t lift it so he struck low and hard at Cesar. The Brazilian keeper deflected the shot but it caromed to Wayne Rooney at the top of the box and the United man simply placed it into the net. As usual, I suppose, Arsenal created and United finished.

It’s going to be seen by some as over-hyping the young England star but that’s just the way the world works these days: any time someone has a bad performance, there will be vociferous apologists and any time someone has a good performance the very same folks will loudly denounce the reporter as hyping the player. The fact is that Jack Wilshere was the standout player in a game which featured a collection of the most expensive players in world football — Oscar, Ronaldinho, Ramires, Luiz, Cesar, and of course the much ballyhooed Neymar, a player who is so highly rated that Manchester City have offered his club a blank check. It’s not hype if Jack was objectively better, and he was.

The forgotten man for much of the game was Theo Walcott. The Arsenal striker tortured his marker all night long and despite some unlucky moments and the fact that he didn’t get on the scoresheet, it was his movement and dribbling which opened Brazil for both goals. The first goal is already documented above but after Brazil leveled through a defensive error by Gary Cahill, the Three Lions looked to Theo time and again to bail the team out. Walcott’s personal battle with Adriano must have been humiliating for the Barcelona man as he was turned inside out like double-knit reversible slacks time and again.

Dribbling is something that Theo has clearly been working on and his touch with the ball at pace has greatly improved, but he hardly needed crafty dribbling as he could simply beat Adriano with pace. That’s exactly what he did for England’s second. Dipping his shoulder to the left, Theo flicked the ball to his right and easily ran past Adriano into space. His cross could have been better at that point but it was a well struck low ball into a dangerous area and Brazil failed to clear. The resulting pinball ended at Frank Lampard’s feet and the big Chelsea man just smashed it past everyone to put England in the lead for good.

Pardon me, Adriano, do you have any Grey Poupon?

From that point on you would expect England to sit back and invite waves of pressure from a classy Brazil side but that game plan was never in Hodgson’s book. England still looked to dominate the  midfield and did well winning possession and keeping the ball despite the constant pressing from Brazil. In the end they did just enough and with two excellent penalty saves from Joe Hart, became the first England side to beat the Brazilians in 50 years. Redemption for Hodgson’s game plan if ever there was any.

After the game, Jack spoke well of the balance of youth and experience in the England side, a policy which is currently being mimicked at Arsenal. Arsenal play with Arteta in the deep role behind Jack and the Spaniard is far from the midfield destroyer that many call for, but neither is Steven Gerrard who played the holding role for England last night. Rather than Cattermole style tackling, what they both bring, instead, is exceptional positioning, patience, and the ability to spread play from deep. A quality that Andrea Pirlo brings to the Italian side. In many ways that’s what modern football is all about and it’s fantastic to see Roy Hodgson developing an England team that does more than hoof the ball to a big center forward.

Gunners should also be proud of the fact that Ashley Cole got his 100th England cap. He would be an England star regardless of the team he played for and while I know that he is considered a traitor to the cause that shouldn’t stop folks from celebrating him as one of Arsenal’s most capped academy graduates. Arsenal made Ashley Cole from his academy days to the finishing school of the Invincibles. That he left Arsenal for a few more silver coins down in Fulham does not tarnish that Arsenal legacy.

Arsenal supporters have a hate-hate relationship with international’s and especially with injuries caused by midweek international friendlies. This week is no exception in that regard as word filters back that Laurent Koscielny might have aggravated a pre-existing calf injury while playing for France. But the fact that Arsenal have so many players who play in these internationals is down to the fact that the club have so many talented players. And while I agree that perhaps there should be an international “season” sometime in the early Summer, rather than spread out throughout the year, I see a performance like the one Jack Wilshere put in yesterday and think that it has to lift Arsenal for the the rest of the season. After all, if Jack Wilshere can lift the English national team against Brazil, imagine what he could do against Sunderland on Saturday.

Qq