Media Round-up; the Good, Bad, and Ugly
Arsenal supporters the world over are breathlessly waiting for the 4th estate to weigh in and see if they are to maintain their anti-Arsenal bias or if they are going to take on the culture of English football which glorifies leg-breaking tackles.
Unfortunately, there are some scum, the Tony Cascarino’s* of the world, who are still banging on about the “speed of the game” and how “such a lovely lad” like Shawcross could never harm a fly much less a Welshman. Fortunately, from what I can tell, their numbers are getting smaller as thinking folks, like Patrick Barclay, weigh in and blame the establishment for what happened on Saturday.
Here’s a round-up of the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in today’s media.
The Good
There was a remarkable interview on the SkySports Sunday Supplement with Sam Wallace of the Independent, Patrick Barclay of The Times, and Neil Custis from The Sun. If you only have time for one interview or article today about this issue, this is the one. It starts slow, with Sam Wallace doing the whole “just too quick” and “he’s not that type of player” bullshit but then Patrick Barclay and Neil Custis step in and take the interview over.
Barclay is adamant that the problem is that there’s a “wildness” to the English game that is considered not only acceptable but is encouraged. Moreover, his example of this wildness is last season’s tackle by Ryan Shawcross on Adebayor which happened 5 yards off the pitch. It’s a subtle dig at the whole notion that “Shawcross isn’t this type of guy” when so very clearly after breaking Francis Jeffers’ ankle two years ago, then the Adebayor tackle, and now the Ramsey tackle, Ryan Shawcross is that type of guy. If by that type of guy you mean “someone who is at best serially reckless and at worst intentionally out to harm his fellow professionals.”
But Barclay makes another important point and that is how in England a player can tackle another with their studs 8 inches off the ground but in other leagues that is simply not acceptable. He then reiterates my point of yesterday that this is the fault of the refs and the FA; players wouldn’t tackle like that if they were red carded for it irregardless the broken legs.
And then Neil Custis from The Sun weighs in with his criticism of the teams which simply come out to kick Arsenal off the pitch. In this he backs up Arsene Wenger’s claims and again points the finger directly at the FA for not doing anything about it.
But it’s what Barclay says at the end that’s truly remarkable. As they are getting ready to fade out, the presenter asks if Arsenal can win the title. Barclay says no, but he praises Arsenal as the team in England with the most fiber and mental strength, which they showed with their 3-1 win over Stoke. Again, it’s spot on. I have never seen a team recover from a tackle like that and go on to dominate their opponents the way that Arsenal did on Saturday. Truly amazing grit from this team. Truly.
Meanwhile, Martin Samuel asks how three broken legs in 4 years can be simply down to accident. The best part of this article was the quote, from 2007, about Ryan Shawcross breaking Francis Jeffers’ ankle:
There is no way that was a malicious challenge,’ said David Kemp, assistant manager of Stoke City. ‘Ryan isn’t that sort of player. It was probably a new experience for him to get frustrated, that’s why he chased down the ball and made that tackle.‘There was no malicious intent. It was a genuine attempt. We’ve seen far worse challenges go unpunished. It was just one of those football injuries, one of those incidents that frequently happen in the game. Before long Ryan might be on the end of one himself.
Maybe he’ll get on the end of one himself? Amazingly, that is the mentality in English football isn’t it? Don’t end the wild tackles which cut down people’s careers, tackle back just as wildly.
The Bad
Graham Poll came out against the Shawcross tackle but doesn’t add to the debate. So, I’m putting that here, in the bad. Besides which I can’t really have a Graham Poll article in my good category, can I?
John Cross from the Mirror, who tweeted the other day about how sick to death he is about fans complaining about an anti-Arsenal media bias, puts out what on it’s surface looks like an even handed article which simply details the events and where Ramsey is in the recovery but he ends the article in a peculiar manner:
But Stoke boss Tony Pulis has defended his player, pointing out that he has never been sent off before and also said his team have been victims in the past.
Pulis said: “It’s a disappointing challenge and as I say it’s so ironic that Ryan’s involved in it because of all the players that we’ve got here he’s such a gentle kid, such a gentle lad.
“Just by the effect it had as he was walking off the pitch and what’s happened since it will be devastating for him. We’ll have to make sure we keep a close eye on him. My condolences go out to Aaron and Arsenal. No one likes to see that happen.
“I honestly don’t think that Ryan is the type of a person who would ever go out to do anything like this. We’ll see what effect it has on him. But he’s a great lad.
“Rory Delap broke his leg in a challenge with a Sunderland player a few years ago and was out for nearly eight months. We dealt with it in-house and got on with it.”
Of course the lead sentence is the most important in any article, but second is the ending and here he ends with what many Stoke fans are pointing to as a reason why Shawcross’ red card should be appealed. In the demented minds of cavemen like Tony Pulis since they had one of their legs broken at one point, that makes it ok for them to break legs. And John Cross from the Mirror, gave credence to that by printing that retarded quote — you know, to “balance” his article.
The Ugly
These article are easy to find, open the Independent and you will see they run the gamut from pro-Shawcross pieces which claim the footballer is simply “unlucky” to articles describing the pain that Shawcross is in and how his teammates are rallying around the poor lad. That first, the Sam Wallace piece is most remarkable since it sets out to describe what a great guy Shawcross is and how we shouldn’t label him as dangerous, despite the indisputable fact that Ryan Shawcross broke Francis Jeffers’ leg in 2007, tackled Adebayor off the pitch last season and put the striker out for 3 weeks, and broke Aaron Ramsey’s leg this year. What exactly does the kid need to do to earn the label dangerous? Hit someone with a brickbat?
There are so many of these type of articles out there right now that it’s not even funny. Each paper has a variation on the “Stoke rally around wounded Shawcross” story that it almost seems they are taking copy from each other. The Times’ piece by Oliver Kay is almost comical in its strident defense of the “passion” of the English game: as if passion can only be expressed in leg breaking tackles. Kay even makes the claim that these leg-breakers are what make the EPL so marketable. I’ve heard that before, over here in the States in relation to our American football where “big hits” are a part of the game that many are seeking to stamp out. I guess that sport is no fun to some people unless they can turn it into blood and guts, “modern gladiators” and all that pablum.
But the final word has to go to two of my favorite columnists Shirtless Jaime Redknapp and Tony Cascarino** who both simply say something stupid, don’t back it up, and move on. Redknapp calls Aaron Ramsey “unlucky.” UNLUCKY! Like there were some fans in the stands who witnessed Ryan Shawcross break Aaron Ramsey’s leg and said “ohhh, unlucky Aaron, unlucky!”
Cascarino*** takes this “unlucky” theme and compounds the douchenozzlery by throwing in his two-cents worth in saying he didn’t even think it was a red card. Fucking mind-blowing, really. Just fucking mind-blowing.
How much are these two guys paid to say this stuff and how the fuck do I get THAT gig?
Conclusion
I want to end with a Rafa Benitez quote. After playing Sam Allardyce’s Blackburn Rovers and seeing his players kicked all over the pitch by a pack of cheats and scum like El-Hadji Diouf, Rafa coughed up this gem:
We try to do our talking on the pitch. If they are pleased with the way they play under this manager it is their decision. They have a style and they are a team that plays this way under this manager.
I think it is a model for all the managers around the world, their style of football, his behavior. It is the perfect model for all the kids and I’m sure all parents will enjoy this model and encourage their kids to be the same. The style of football, I think, Barcelona are thinking of copying
The same could be said about a dozen or so teams in the EPL, Rafa. A dozen.
*I apologize for my language here, I know how rude it is to use that word.
** Again, my apologies.
***7amkickoff sincerely regrets the use of such language and will attempt to not say this word ever again.
